Truth About Computer Security Hysteria

A very powerful ally in the fight against hysteria

Somebody convinced President Clinton to avoid the phrase "electronic Pearl Harbor." We have a very powerful ally in the fight against hysteria.

I call it a staggering remark because I expected our Computer-in-Chief to belittle those who died so long ago. Why wouldn't he? Countless generals, elected officials, and presidential appointees blathered in the 1990s about a coming "electronic Pearl Harbor." It remains a sexy catch phrase to this day in U.S. military circles.

I waited for "ePH" fearmongers to react in knee-jerk fashion. I waited for them to put the appropriate words in Clinton's and/or Reno's mouth.

I waited in vain. Somebody convinced high-ranking bureaucrats not to shoot themselves in the foot. Somebody convinced the Oval Office not to belittle the memory of Pearl Harbor. Somebody convinced FBI NIPC fearmonger Michael Vatis to lay low during the media frenzy.

Do you realize the influence this "somebody" must wield? We have a very powerful ally in the fight against hysteria.

So! The president won't use "electronic Pearl Harbor." I racked my brains for a decent analogy... Then Internet user Chris Nelson came to my rescue:

If [President Clinton] wanted to compare those attacks to something more realistic, the example of a French McDonalds restaurant a year or so ago comes to mind. You might have heard that a local farmer there was upset about prices he was getting, and decided that the proper target for his ire was McDonalds. So he took a manure spreader into town and sprayed the front of the restaurant with manure. This is a reasonable comparison, I think, to the recent DoS attacks: annoying, upsetting, inconvenient, and it takes a few hours to resolve. Then it's over.